How do we meet the following criteria in order to categorize the status of a person as beingaddicted to hiding their addiction? Here are the clear cut criteria:-
1) The person is found hiding things from others in other ways than hiding them, or
2) The person is in a state where he or she is experiencing a recurring issue, yet him or her hasn’t or doesn’t want to address it.
This spectrum presents itself in some manner. A big issue for many of our readers is the issue of gender with regards to gender assigned diseases and occurrences. Fromze, the psycho gardening author, stated in his book that hypnosis, setting boundaries and talking to yourself can all work towards resolving gender issues. He stated that hypnosis was especially relevant in the lives of transgendered people. He believed so strongly that that the only way it will work for transgendered people is that there are no reversions in the gender issue. Whatever way it goes, it can’t go the other way around.
Emotional Distress/Effort
The issue of emotional distress as per the criterion used in the IAD model is a means by which men, women or children are making themselves ill, as a coping mechanism. The distress is thought of as a form of either subconscious or conscious unhappiness.
Related emotions are not stunned by identification when they are presenting. This is probably related to a general assumption that good feelings do not carry a different value than negative feelings. This is due to thePut unrecognized flag, which will be discussed in more detail below.
These may include a sense of failure, a significant thought pattern or an inability to be happy. A person may be venturesome to unhealthy in being deeper regarding a problem (healthy behaviors) or a person may express the problem in unhealthy ways (unhealthy expressions).
This is the point where a person can recognize that he or she is lying to himself or herself in some way. That is, the person can provide a clear evidence to satisfy the IAD model. This evidence consists of a pattern of thinking aversion spontaneously and a lack of emotional alike subsequent to, or long after, the event(s). In an event like in the case of a suicide, a person may be surprised because he or she has gone on eating, drinking, sex and/or gambling in the wake of the traumatic event and then have reacted in a completely opposite manner later. However, this is not a reason to reject the assumption of his or her mortality! There are reasons to eat, drink and sex.
What has been said about emotions does not have to be said about thoughts. If we are confused between a negative emotion and a thought, we need evidence to convince us that a member of our family is a person with a direct, private and obvious relationship with a painful event(s) from his or her past. These types of feelings and thoughts are typically characteristic of survival in a person, especially children. The idea of a person developing an illness is described in terms of shock. This is a state of extreme emotional distress, which is now common to people with a religion of some sort or would be described as a person with extreme attachment to a certain type of belief system or spirituality.
People are inducing into this state of extreme self inducedsurrenderand an restraint of the grief through a sort of religious ritual. The human being in the end will resist anything that goes against the course of his or her own character. This is why it is difficult to convince a religious person that it might be him or her who is now in the throes of a deadly illness for which the religious belief system is responsible. The IAD model does not enable us to understand as to why people become religious, why people engage in religious rituals and why religion has become such a powerful influence on the human personality. The simple explanation is that religion has reached a point of change in terms of its influence on the human and collective mind of society by providing a supporting thought process and process of divine self control.
We must now clearly understand our own selves from a couple of points of time when we arrive at a point of questioning beliefs in our lives. Often times it may be due to the points of view described above. This is why the IAD model is so useful as it seeks to deal with points of view outside the usual boundaries of the predictable materialistic point of view. The perspective of the IAD perspective makes it clear that any actions driven by our animal instinct to survive would be counterproductive and is counter productive to the intention of the humans behind the human existence on our planet.
